Infections For Profit
Did you think the AIDS controversy went away, especially regarding questionable diagnoses and tests?
What about other forms of questionable testing like ELISA and Western Blot regarding Lyme disease and other ‘epidemics’? Did you know they could easily be manipulated as well and had their own controversies but PCR testing revolutionized the ability to manipulate biological data.
Kary Banks Mullis (December 28, 1944 – August 7, 2019) was an American biochemist. In recognition of his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, he shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year. His invention became a central technique in biochemistry and molecular biology.
Kary Mullis went on to expose the fraudulent use of PCR as well the helping millions understand how test data can be manipulated and used as a tool to dragnet large groups in to believing they have an infectious disease when they don’t. He also helped expose the non existence of required postulates that offer confirmation of a diseased state in humans that up until the AIDS outbreak were a matter of course for confirmation in every research facility in the world.
The video at right gives a brief overview regarding the history and just how dangerous the use of PCR has and can become when misused, including in today’s viral outbreak crisis.
You don’t have to wonder how Kary Mullis would respond to the current outbreak, he was horrified to discover how his invention was being used and would see no difference in the ‘official story’ of today, only unfortunately amplified beyond his worst nightmare as a chemist who hoped his invention would be used well for its intended cause.
History repeats. Those who seek to expose the truth are censored, shunned, disbelieved and worse.
What other tests, wrongful diagnoses and other shady scientific behavior has been exposed to authorities in the United States and worldwide in the years pre and post PCR? How could that affect you?
You will be shocked to learn the number of authorities and institutions who knew, published and proceeded with harmful treatments with little basis for doing so and with virtually no oversight.
How does that affect treatment options? Anti virals are definitely not in the same category as anti microbials as you will see in the following paper but even so common infections are prone to being diagnosed with similar fraudulent tests that can be manipulated in much the same manner leading to unnecessary and harmful treatments that can damage the immune system.
You won’t want to miss this full report that includes data, signatures, consequence, testimony, actual letters and more regarding medical fraud that has been presented in legislatures and to medical authorities throughout the world.
Download the full confidential report below.
President Trump’s doctor, said that Trump’s diagnosis was confirmed using the PCR test. Just like virtually every other ‘confirmed case’ we hear reported. But was PCR really developed with the intention of diagnosing infectious diseases? Is PCR capable of diagnosing infectious diseases? How could a test developed almost 40 years ago be used to diagnose a brand new disease found less than one year ago? In this report, we examine questions in addition to reviewing video clips of multiple doctors weighing in on the subject including the biochemist Kary Mullis who invented PCR and won a Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
The Golden Bug
A brief history of the types of fraud I uncovered on my own journey. I should add the most effective anti-microbial ever discovered (treatment I used), incapable of inducing mutation with a core ring B12. THAT should’ve refocused everyone’s attention to other causes in the majority of cases. It didn’t. Another part of the lie that caused the ultimate damage was the misconception there is no hope for healing (for you), also widespread.
Lawyers prepare to sue over damages inflicted by COVID-19 lockdowns
An international group of lawyers is preparing to sue the World Health Organization (WHO) over damages inflicted on large parts of the population by the coronavirus lockdowns.
Fuellmich and his colleagues argue that PCR tests, as promoted by the WHO and other organizations, as well as numerous public health officials, are to be blamed for the lockdowns.
PCR tests “do not give any indication of an infection with any virus, let alone an infection with SARS-CoV-2,” Fuellmich said.
“If someone tests positive, it does not mean that they are infected with anything, let alone with a contagious SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
“The test cannot distinguish inactive and reproductive matter,” he continued. “That means that a positive result may happen because the test detects e.g. a piece of debris, a fragment of a molecule, which may signal nothing else than that the immune system of the person tested won a battle with the common cold in the past.”
Fuellmich summarized, “In short: This test cannot detect any infection, contrary to all false claims stating that it can.
While class action lawsuits are not an option in most of the world, Fuellmich and his colleagues want to go to court in the United States or Canada, where this special type of lawsuit is a regular part of legal practice. This class action lawsuit can then be joined by “all affected parties worldwide.”